Estonian Church bishop speaks at UN about violations of believers’ rights
According to the bishop, the Estonian Orthodox Church cannot renounce “canonical ties, as they are part of our faith”.
Bishop Daniil (Lepisk) of Tartu addressed the 58th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, raising concerns over discrimination against Orthodox believers of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (EOC-MP).
As reported on the official website of the EOC-MP, Bishop Daniil voiced serious concerns before diplomats from UN member states, UN officials, and representatives of international human rights organizations regarding a bill proposing amendments to Estonia’s Law on Churches and Congregations.
“Currently, the Estonian parliament is reviewing a law that would prohibit us from maintaining any ties with a religious center in the Russian Federation. However, we cannot renounce our canonical connection, as it is part of our faith,” the bishop stated.
He emphasized that the proposed legislation effectively places responsibility on the Estonian Orthodox Church for the actions of religious leaders in another country, which “violates the legal principle of individual responsibility.”
“We believe the actions of the Estonian authorities contradict international law and may lead to serious consequences, fostering societal hatred and violations of human rights,” Bishop Daniil said.
According to him, the Estonian Orthodox Church plans to begin active human rights advocacy on the international stage to seek an effective legal and diplomatic response to threats against religious freedom posed by the proposed law.
The bishop’s address was supported by the international human rights alliance Church Against Xenophobia and Discrimination, as well as organizations with consultative status at the UN ECOSOC – Public Advocacy and VSI Zmogaus teisiu apsauga.
Oleg Denisov, head of Public Advocacy, stated that the planned changes to Estonian legislation “contradict international law, as they violate freedom of religion, which includes the right of believers to freely choose the legal and organizational structure of their religious community without external interference.”
“The state cannot dictate to believers the parameters or conditions for practicing their faith, nor can it prohibit or demand the severance of historically established canonical ties,” Denisov emphasized.
He also noted that his organization would support the EOC-MP through legal work to defend its interests under the UN’s special procedures, the OSCE, and other international human rights mechanisms.
Earlier, UOJ reported that an Estonian court dismissed complaints filed by the EOC-MP against the Riigikogu.
